How the Maid Made a Difference Essay Example for Free

How the Maid Made a Difference EssayMaid in Manhattan is one of the numerous Hollywood movies which portrayed the typical fairytale clichea love that went wrong but with the twainsome eventually ending happily ever after. The movie rose above the usual chick flicks in the industry through its capitalistic twist, nonetheless. Marisa Ventura, the hotel maid and single m new(prenominal) from the Bronx, and Chris Marshall, a successor to an American policy-making dynasty, crossed paths and consequently fell into apiece others hands and hearts.The on-screen chemistry of the two artists, as well as the romantic, light, and interesting flow of the plot evidently captivated millions of audience universe of discoursewide. Not many, however, might have seen the posture of a deeper elaboration of significant and pressing issues in the movie. An allegory regarding ethnicity and culture, Maid in Manhattan was successful in revealing the ongoing plight of Latin immigrants in the United States. Due to their br admit skin color, homegrown tongue, and diverse beliefs, these individuals have been usually employed in blue-collar jobs, as depicted in the movie.The hotel in which Marisa worked in was headed by purely sporty Americans, with brown-bloods like her assigned for housekeeping. When Marisas friend pushed her into applying for the vacated managerial position, she initially declined due to the fact that black or brown was and still remain to be the opposite of exsanguine in terms of class status. Aside from the manager application scene, a number of other portions in the movie clearly showcased the same idea in come out to emphasize the continuous emergence of heathenish inequity. Marisa and Chris romance flourished despite their differences in ethnicity and culture.It is necessary to none, however, that during the first time Chris saw Marisa, he did not offspring notice of her since she was merely a hotel maid cleaning the senatorial candidates bathroom . Once Marisa donned the white-hot Dolce and Gabbana suit of Caroline, one of the hotel guests, Marisa turned from ugly duckling into a beautiful swan in the look of Chris. This, indeed, is an example of commodification of identity. According to Knadler, this idea signifies the strong power of products and commodities in developing a policy-making delegacy in society.Unfortunately, however, the political voice and visibility of an American usually depends on his whiteness or pecuniary capacity. As shown in the movie, the physical appearance of Marisa greatly affected how Chris admired and understood her. In addition, it seemed that if the pol met Marisa as her real self, the profoundness of her political opinions with respect to issues such as electoral publicity and lodging programs would seem less believable and significant for him. Hence, it can be said that intelligence is inevitably match to companionable class.Carolines friend Rachel also judged Marisas intellectual ca pacity during another retinue scene. Rachels remark that Marisa knew only little English for she was of Latin descent visibly portrayed political prejudice based merely on the difference between skin pigmentation. This kind of misconception is known as victimization ideology, the power and control of vital social institutions to create weakness in a current class or group (Faun). Unfortunately, this power and control is defined by monetary value. The financially deprive thus continue to end up as underdogs in the field, leaving them lower than they already atomic number 18.Nevertheless, these conflicts should not be blamed solely outside the group of American immigrants. They, too, are internally outlawed by their own political and social inhibitions. Brown-bloods like Marisa learned to depend too overmuch on the norms readily established in the society that they overlook the fact that these norms are merely standards these do not regularise yet only inform them how they sh ould live their lives based on a historical point of heap that is not their own. It was Marisas mother, though, who was significantly captured by these biases and discrimination that she was the one directly trying to put her fille down.She saw Marisa as a housekeeper and only as a housekeeper for, according to her, that is what the society has supposedly established for Marisa. This limited and narrow outlook regarding ones concept of self is hence determined and cause by both outward and inward influences. Maid in Manhattan successfully utilized the abovementioned scenes in order to bring forth an image explaining how cultural differences greatly affect social and working relations to its audience. However, the behavior in which the viewers comprehend this image is dependent on what group these people hail from.In my opinion, if it were a white-skinned audience, these specific scenes may imply how American immigrants are dedicated to their jobs, whatever this may be. Conversel y, if those who are watching this film are of the same heritage as Marisa, then their perception of the movie would be fairly different. In my opinion, the movie serves as a venue for American immigrants to shatter borders and to assimilate themselves with the white culture. This act of multicultural integration remains to be their aspirationtheir dreamin a world divided by money and power.Moreover, the brown-skinned audience would very much appreciate a film regarding their own social and political plight. Despite the white-washing of entertainment nowadays, films like these are still produced in the attempt to hive away the culture of the Latin descent and to communicate change in society (Ethnic). Visibility in Media is indeed a positive and necessary step in order to create more pregnant grounds for the harmony and amalgamation of ethnicities. This multicultural integration in Maid in Manhattan is denoted by two symbols, both related metaphorically to Chris and Marisas marriag e.First is the actual bind of person-to-person through matrimony. In the context of the movie, nevertheless, the connection established was between and among races. This signifies the mergence of people, no matter what their skin complexion is, where they came from, or how much they earn monthly. In addition, the main characters marriage represented the unity of ideologies and cultures that define both parties. Individuals may co-exist with each other despite the differences of their beliefs, traditions, and lifestyles as long as they learn to compromise and adapt to each others way of living.These two concepts of marriage in Maid in Manhattan uphold egalitarianism, a social philosophy advocating the removal of inequalities among people (Weebies). Though the battle for human and racial equality is still not completely won, there will always be hope not only in the future tense but in ones self. Although we serve them, we are not their servants. What we do does not define who we are . What defines us is how we rise after falling, shared Lionel, Marisas co-housekeeper in the hotel. Indeed, classes may rise and fall. Mistakes may be done once or all over again. Money can change or damage. fill in can make us happy or sad. Whatever occurs in our lifetime, one thing remains the same we are all humanshumans like everyone else, humans who can make a difference. We just have to believe that we can create our own identity and destiny.Works CitedEthnic and viewable Minorities in Entertainment Media. Media Issues. 2008. Media Awareness Network. 10 Apr. 2008 http//www. media-awareness. ca/english/issues/ stereotyping/ethnics_and_minorities/minorities_entertainment. cfm. Faun, Feral. The Ideology of Victimization. Insurgent Desire. 1992. Black and putting green Network.10 Apr. 2008 http//www. insurgentdesire. org. uk/victimization. htm. Knadler, S. Blanca from the Block Whiteness and the Transnational Latina Body. Genders Online Journal. 2005. Anne Kibbey. 10 Apr. 20 08 http//www. genders. org/g41/g41_ knadler. html. Maid in Manhattan. Dir. Wayne Wang. Per. Jennifer Lopez, Ralph Fiennes, Natasha Richardson, Bob Hoskins, and Kevin Wade. Revolution Studios distribution Company, 2002. Weebies. Egalitarianism The Holy Grail of Socialism. Strike The Root. 2004. 10 Apr. 2008 http//www. strike-the-root. com/4/weebies/weebies5. html.